Friday Rant: Tasting Room Fees

I am out West this week with my son, visiting a few potential colleges on his Spring Break (yes, Sebastian will be graduating next year from high school). It just so happens that some of the schools are located in or near wine country. As such, I popped into a few tasting rooms when there was a bit of downtime.

As many in the wine industry are dismayed by the decrease in alcohol consumption and looking for ways to attract (and keep) younger consumers, I was shocked to see that tasting room fees continue to hover at around $50 per “experience”. Now, I am not sure about you, but when I was in my 20s, there was no way in you-know-what that I was going to plop down half a hundred to try something I was not sure I was going to like.

With that in mind, I thought I would revisit a post from about two years ago, where I lamented the state of tasting room fees.

Weird, a coincidence, or something else? When I sat down to write this post, I had a vague recollection that I had previously written about the topic of today’s rant: tasting room fees.

So I searched my (close to) 3,000 posts, and I realized that I had, indeed, written about the money grab that is tasting room fees on April 4th, 2013. Just about as close as you can get to precisely a decade later.

I had a lovely tasting at Quivira, and I have no idea what they charge for a tasting. I only include this picture because of the “Tasting Room” sign.

Ten years after that original post, tasting room fees are not only, in my opinion, still a problem, they are now out of control.

I understand the basic premise of the tasting room fee, I really do. Set a price that will dissuade the casual drinker from popping in to down a bunch of free juice and wasting everyone’s time. There are costs associated with operating a tasting room that do not get covered if you allow everyone to waltz in, toss back a few ounces of wine, and then skedaddle. Thus, attaching a, say, $20 fee for the tasting would cover it, and “reimbursing” or waving the fee if the customer makes a nominal minimum purchase makes good business sense, at least to me.

Fine.

But.

As a result of the pandemic, most (85% according to the Sonoma Wine Tasting Blog) tasting rooms are now by appointment only. This also makes sense to me as it makes it easier to schedule staff to cover the tasting room–it is not wise to pay someone to hang around all day on the chance that a potential customer might drop in. This also helps in limiting the number of casual “customers” who might want to stop in for a few free glasses of wine on their way to dinner. (By the way, that last point has been all but eliminated by the fact that almost all tasting rooms close by 5:00 or earlier.)

Again. Fine.

But.

As a proud EV owner (and renter) tasting room fees are softened considerably when there is a free charging station!

Today, as I sit in my hotel room writing this, in addition to being by appointment only, many wineries now charge what I consider exorbitant fees for a tasting.* The days of the nominal $5, $10, or even $20 seem to be long gone. Now, it is much more common to see $30, $50, $75, or higher fees to taste wines. Sure, now they are called “tasting experiences” and often include a charcuterie board, a brick-oven pizza, or an “exquisite tasting experience that was designed to pair perfectly with our wines by our in-house world-renowned chef”.

*Again, according to the Sonoma Wine Tasting Blog, the average tasting room fee jumped from about $25 pre-pandemic to nearly $40 today, with “reserve tastings” (whatever that means) starting at $50 in most places.

Huh?

What if I just want to have a taste of a few of your wines in order to decide if I want to purchase a bottle or twelve? Sorry, that option no longer exists in many tasting rooms it seems. To make matters worse? It is becoming increasingly less common for tasting rooms to waive their fees when one purchases a wine.

Case in point.

One of my favorite producers in Healdsburg recently recounted the following experience. She had a group of eight that had an appointment in her tasting room (she charges a fee, I am not sure what it is, but she waives it with a purchase), and they ended up buying five cases of wine. Fantastic. They asked her for a recommendation for a winery to visit the following day, and she decided to call a winery that I had just visited and raved about–wonderful wines, beautiful spot.

On the phone, she explained that she was from another winery in the area, and she had a wonderful group that she would like to send their way. Before she could even finish her sentence, the person on the other end of the call bluntly stated that there was a $35 tasting fee per person plus a 20% mandatory gratuity (that’s another $7 for the math-challenged). When asked if they waived the fee with a purchase, there was a pause, and then the response “with six bottles, per person.”

Yikes.

My friend decided to send them in another direction, to a place that would be at least a little more welcoming.

And I don’t blame her one bit.

More reading:

Tasting Room Fees Skyrocket in Wine Country

Tasting room fees rise in Sonoma County in pandemic aftermath

Unknown's avatar

About the drunken cyclist

I have been an occasional cycling tour guide in Europe for the past 20 years, visiting most of the wine regions of France. Through this "job" I developed a love for wine and the stories that often accompany the pulling of a cork. I live in Houston with my lovely wife and two wonderful sons.
This entry was posted in Wine and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Friday Rant: Tasting Room Fees

  1. Art's avatar Art says:

    Last month we went to Oregon to go wine tasting and check out the wineries. We went to one Winery $90 per tasting, now times that by 3 people crazy amount of money.

    Was totally turned off. Thank God the second Winery I’m a member of so the tasting was waved but I believe for the experience it was $100 if you’re not a member.

    Fantastic wine but not worth the price for just a simple taste..

    Like

  2. Tom's avatar Tom says:

    With the caveat that two of our group owned a winery in Oregon, we were just in Healdsburg for a week and really enjoyed. We stayed at Vrbo on Vislay, just south of town. Fees were all over the place, from none to $75. Some waived fees with purchase and some did not (we bought 4 bottles – 2 cases at all 13!!). Some gave case discounts, some did not. Some waived shipping (as high as $95/cs) some did not. We were group of 8 so always made a reservation. Many tasting rooms had the dreaded limo/bus with a wedding party that is mainly there to drink. As we were hitting 2-3 per day we were definitely in the taste-only mode. Having said all this we had a great time and don’t regret the tasting room fees. With one exception all provided exceptional service from very knowledgeable attendants up to master sommelier, and fantastic tours led my either vineyard manager/winemaker or the owner in at least three tours. Two owners joined us at the Vrbo; one for dinner, one for drinks. Just a great time.

    Perhaps a hopeful note, a couple of the owners noted that demand was slipping and they were re-thinking the reservation-only mode and tasting room pricing. Speculating this risks less knowledgeable staff, shorter and limited pours, and a less enjoyable experience overall.

    P.S., Go Blue!!

    Like

  3. Joe Lynch's avatar Joe Lynch says:

    We no longer go to Napa or Sonoma because of the cost. We have club memberships in Amador and Anderson Valley where fees are reasonable and it doesn’t feel like Disneyland.

    Like

  4. Chef Mimi's avatar Chef Mimi says:

    Oh dear! I had no idea!

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.